Original article
Study on the PET image quality according to various scintillation detectors based on the Monte Carlo simulation
Eunsoo Kim1, Chanrok Park2
1Radiology, Seoul Asan Medical Center, Seoul, South Korea
2Dept. of Radiological Science, Eulji University, Gyonggi, South Korea
Correspondence to Chanrok Park, Department of Radiological Science, Eulji University, 553, Sanseong-daero, Sujeong-gu, Seongnamsi, Gyeonggi, 13135, South Korea, Tel :+82-31-740-7185, E-mail : tigeaglepcr@eulji.ac.kr
Volume 27, Number 2, Article 18, November 2023. Korean J Nucl Med Technol 2023;27(2):18. https://doi.org/10.12972/kjnmt.20230018
Received on August 21, 2022, Revised on August 30, 2023, Accepted on September 12, 2023, Published on November 31, 2023.
Copyright © 2023 Author(s). This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Abstract
Purpose: Positron emisson tomography (PET) is a crucial medical imaging scanner for the detection of cancer lesions. In order to maintain the improved image quality, it is crucial to apply detectors of superior performance. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to compare PET image quality using Monte Carlo simulation based on the detector materials of BGO, LSO, and LuAP. Materials and Methods: The Geant4 Application for Tomographic Emission (GATE) was used to design the PET detector. Scintillations with BGO, LSO and LuAP were modelled, with a size of 3.95 × 5.3 mm2 (width × height) and 25.0 mm (thickness). The PET detector consisted of 34 blocks per ring and a total of 4 rings. A line source of 1 MBq was modelled and acquired with a radius of 1 mm and length of 20 mm for 20 seconds. The acquired image was reconstructed maximum likelihood expectation maximization with 2 iteration and 10 subsets. The count comparison was carried out. Results and Discussion: The highest true, random, and scatter counts were obtained from the BGO scintillation detector compared to LSO and LuAP. Conclusion: The BGO scintillation detector material indicated excellent performance in terms of detection of gamma rays from emitted PET phantom.
Keywords
GATE simulation, Positron emission tomography, scintillation detector, Nuclear medicine, Quantitative analysis