Original article [ASNMT]
Effect of Noise Reduction Filters in Extracardiac Accumulation Masking Processing on Defect Score and Left Ventricular Volume
Mitsuha Fukami1, Norikazu Matsutomo2, Tomoaki Yamamoto1
1Department of Medical Radiological Technology, Faculty of Health Sciences, Kyorin University, Tokyo, Japan
2Department of Radiological Technology, Faculty of Health Science and Technology, Kawasaki University of Medical Welfare, Okayama, Japan
Correspondence to Mitsuha Fukami, Department of Medical Radiological Technology, Faculty of Health Sciences, Kyorin University, 5-4-1 Shimorenjaku, Mitaka-shi, Tokyo 181-8612, Japan, Tel: +81-422-47-8000, E-mail: mitsuha-f@ks.kyorin-u.ac.jp
Volume 30, Number 1, Article 1, May 2026. Korean J Nucl Med Technol 2026;30(1):1. https://doi.org/10.12972/kjnmt.2026.30.1.1
Received on December 08, 2025, Revised on December 23, 2025, Accepted on January 08, 2026, Published on May 31, 2026.
Copyright © 2026 Author(s). This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Abstract
Background: The extracardiac accumulation masking (MUS) method reduces artifacts from extracardiac accumulation by masking post-reconstruction and filtering. However, the impact of filter parameters on defect scores and cardiac function remains unclear. Thus, this study aimed to evaluate the effect of noise reduction filters in MUS on the defect score and left ventricular volume. Methods: To simulate the defect area, an RH-2 cardiac phantom (Kyoto Kagaku, Japan) was used with 99mTc solutions for the heart and liver. The heart-liver distance was varied (0, 1, and 2 ㎝). SPECT/CT and image reconstruction was performed using filtered back projection (FBP) with a Butterworth filter. The cut-off frequencies (0.3 to 0.7 cycles/㎝) were applied for both conventional and MUS methods. And a summed score (SS) and the left ventricular volume was employed as evaluation metrics. Results: SS values were more stable with the MUS methods than the conventional methods, especially at distances of 1 and 2 ㎝. Left ventricular volume increased with higher cut-off frequencies with no significant differences between MUS and conventional methods. Conclusion: The MUS method can reduce the impact of different cut-off frequencies on the defect score.
Keywords
Myocardial Perfusion Imaging, Butterworth Filter, Cut-Off Frequency, Left Ventricular Volume, Summed Rest Score